|
|
Conclusion

Daylighting strategies can provide large reduc- 
tions in lighting and cooling-related
energy use, 
as well as improved amenity, satisfaction,
and 
perhaps occupant performance. But the
success- 
ful adoptionof daylighting in the marketplacere- 
quires anintegratedapproachto the design, speci- 
fication, and implementation of envelope and 
lighting technologies. Throug h this research 
project, we believe we were able to take a
small 
but important first step to change how architects, 
facility managers, and industry perceive the no- 
tion of daylighting commercial buildings by sup- 
plying design tools, credible energy performance 
data, demonstrations of future daylighting con-

cepts, and commissioning protocols that address 
key window and lighting
interactions. Clearly, the 
simple conceptual solution of manually switch- 
ing off the lights when sufficient daylight is avail- 
able from an unmanaged window in a naturally 
lit space doesn't work. We have
developed sys- 
tems that save energy consistently and reliably 
while delivering amenity, satisfaction, comfort, 
and health to its occupants through sensitive con- 
trol of daylight intensity and distribution.
Despite the technical and organizational
obstacles 
to the comprehensive integration of building en- 
velope, lighting, and HVAC systems, these dy- 
namic facade and light-redirecting concepts hold 
considerable power to stimulate the architectural 
imagination. It suggests a
fundamentally differ- 
ent approach to optimizing the energy perfor- 
mance of buildings with new fenestration tech- 
nologies while also improving the quality of the 
indoor environment, and displaying in a very tan- 
gible way the ever changing relationship between 
the products of human ingenuity, the local
envi- 
ronment, and the imperative for sustainable de- 
sign solutions. |
|