|
|
|
aging daylight and electric light to provide 50 fc (500 lux) on 
the workplane, and permitting view whenever possible.
The system was built from readily-available
components, which 
might be interchanged later with more advanced technologies. 
The work permitted testing of basic research premises at full- 
scale, enabling us to examine the validity of advanced material 
concepts (such as those for electrochromic glazings) that can- 
not be tested until large prototypes can be built.
Energy, control status, and illuminance data were
collected for 
over a year in both reduced-scale and full-scale field test facili- 
ties. Occupant response studies were also
conducted. Hourly 
DOE-2 building energy simulations predicted that 16-26% an- 
nual energy savings and peak demand reductions could be ob- 
tained with the automated venetian blind|lighting system com- 
pared to an advanced spectrally-selective window system in 
Los Angeles for all window exposures except north. Moni- 
tored daily lighting energy savings averaged 35% in winter and 
ranged from 40-75% in summer, when compared to a similar 
static partly closed blind system with the same daylighting 
control system. If compared to a non-daylighted space, daily 
lighting energy savings ranged from 22-86%. Summer daily 
cooling load reductions were measured to be 5-25%, while peak 
cooling load reductions were even larger. The control system 
met all design objectives over widely varying conditions to 
within 10% for 90% of the 14-month monitoring period in full- 
scale. |
|
|
|