|
|
With retrofit applications, the
process is dysfunctional primarily be- 
causefacility managers are not as well informed, having less resources 
than an A/E team. Economic and process
barriers frustratedeven the 
most well-intentioned facility manager. The order of retrofits is based 
on system breakdowns or approved alterations (lobby upgrades, en- 
ergy-efficiency, etc.). Mechanical and lighting systems are usually re- 
placed first, since they are not as long-lasting and energy-efficiency 
upgrades of such components (VFDs, T8 lamps) usually require less 
total capital and have a shorter payback than envelope systems. Often, 
advanced windows cannot be implemented as a retrofit because the 
energy-efficiency cost-benefits of recently upgraded lighting and me- 
chanical systems (downsized capacity) cannot be folded in. We
encountered several such situations. In Sacramento, a previously 
naturally-ventilated 1932 office building was upgraded with a new me- 
chanical system. The ceiling height was
reduced by 3 ft (1 m) to accom- 
modate new ventilation ducts, blocking daylight from the upper third 
of the window. The entire building
was upgraded with new finishes 
(window shades, painting, etc.). New light
fixtures were installed with 
multi-level switching. Two years after this complete renovation, the 
building managers turned to the upgrade of the exterior of the build- 
ing, including replacement of the single-pane, clear glass windows but 
found their cost-effective
energy-efficiency options limited.
If an
integrated perspective had been taken initially, the facility man- 
ager may have been able to a) reduce the capacity of the chiller and 
possibly the depth of the air distribution ducts, b) design the layout of 
the lighting zones to accommodate future installation of daylighting 
controls (parallel to the window wall, not perpendicular!), and c) de- 
sign the window-to-ceiling detail to admit more daylight and reduce 
the visual contrast in brightness between the interior and window. Ret- 
rofits must not be conducted piecemeal as events come about, rather 
with a proactive perspective of what is to come. Weconveyed this ap- 
proach in a document on spectrally-selective glazings to federal energy 
managers. Institutional changes in policy or design approach could 
also affect the way retrofits are conducted
in businesses that manage a 
large number of facilities. |
|
|